#Mmpi 2 online professional

For the CPI, findings for scales indicating conformity with social norms, integrity, and tolerance were strong, as were the findings for an index indicating risk of termination. For the MMPIвЂ“2вЂ“RF, findings for scales from the emotional dysfunction and interpersonal functioning domains of the test were particularly strong. After applying a statistical correction for range restriction, we found a number of meaningful associations between both CPI and MMPIвЂ“2вЂ“RF substantive scale scores and supervisor ratings. Test scores from both instruments showed substantial range restriction, consistent with those produced by members of the police candidate comparison groups (Corey & Ben-Porath, 2014 Roberts & Johnson, 2001). Substantive scale scores in this sample were meaningfully lower than those obtained by the testsвЂ™ normative samples in the case of the MMPIвЂ“2вЂ“RF and meaningfully higher in the case of the CPI (indicating less psychological dysfunction). We examined associations between prehire California Psychological Inventory (CPI) and prorated Minnesota Multiphasic Personality InventoryвЂ“2 Restructured Form (MMPIвЂ“2вЂ“RF) scores (calculated from MMPI profiles) and supervisor ratings for a sample of 143 male police officers. Roberts, Law Enforcement Psychological Services Inc.

#Mmpi 2 online professional

California School of Professional PsychologyДЄnthony M.

5, 544-555 Predicting Postprobationary Job Performance of Police Officers Using CPI and MMPI-2-RF Test Data Obtained During Preemployment Psychological Screening Authors Below is a summary of the research and findings as well as a translation of this research into practice.ДЇeatured Article | Journal of Personality Assessment | 2019, Vol. This is the bottom line of a recently published article in the Journal of Personality Assessment. The combined use the MMPI-2-RF and the CPI are effective tools for preemployment screening of police and public safety personnel.